Title ix should it be changed

In determining responsibility, the decision-maker must not rely on any statement made by a party or witness who does not submit to cross-examination at the hearing. The institution can bring a complaint and initiate an investigation in particular circumstances if we learn of behavior that necessitates an investigation. The decision-maker may not be the Title IX Coordinator or investigator. And, unlike previous guidance, regulations now require that institutions offer both parties an opportunity to appeal the written determination regarding responsibility or the dismissal of a formal complaint.

Channels: Close. Changes and effects The new regulations contain several significant changes from the previous guidance: A narrower definition of what behavior constitutes sexual harassment. A narrower scope of conduct that is actionable under Title IX. Voluntary informal resolution options are available to the parties throughout the complaint process. Why are we starting with a crime that is so invested in gender-based violence? This should be for the people and should be accessible to them.

Photo Series: UWL students march around campus to show support for survivors. Student Association discusses safety on campus and expresses support for survivors of sexual assault. Students gather to protest the mask mandate at the Recreational Eagle Center. Photo Series: U. UWL Student Association discusses name change to academic buildings. Club Close-Up: Vocal Ties.

UWL anthropology professor discusses new book about buying food on credit in the Dominican Republic. Cancel reply. Your email address will not be published. Close Menu. Submit Search. Navigate Left. Another uncertainty regarding Title IX under the Biden administration is the process for investigating campus sexual assault.

All of these actions, according to critics, have made the Title IX process more complicated for all parties involved. In early June, the DOE hosted a five-day virtual hearing to receive public input for revising these guidelines. Legal experts are hopeful that any changes will result in better clarity and more equitable outcomes for all parties involved in Title IX disputes. Many who work in this field have had difficulties with the confusing regulations put in place by DeVos last year, she says.

Introducing such major revisions in the midst of a global pandemic that upended higher education further complicated the process for campus leaders and Title IX administrators. In addition, critics say the change in how Title IX hearings are conducted last year makes it alarmingly easy to discount testimonies if an accuser fails to show up for a hearing or if they choose not to subject themselves to full cross-examination.